Bewildered, academics pore over sex-trade hysteria
Farley's book cites -- incorrectly -- Brents and Hausbeck's primary research, and arrives at a very different conclusion.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
It's much easier to post news stories and things I read about to a blog, rather than post to my webpage or BlackBoard. This blog contains posts of interest to students from all of my classes.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(98)
-
▼
February
(12)
- Scientists "see" ghosts
- Aggression: "College football games and crime"
- The Power of Being Influenced
- racism in the ER
- Milgram in real life!
- Researchers Gain Understanding of How Poverty Alte...
- The Women's Body Image Quiz
- The skinny on Miss Cleo
- Quarter of U.S. women suffer domestic violence
- From the Scholarship Center
- Whose myth? Ph.D.'s, of course!
- Why we use primary sources
-
▼
February
(12)
Labels
- advertising
- anomalous experience
- anti-depressants
- AUC
- availability-heuristic
- Black-People
- brain
- business
- cartoons
- CUNY
- defense-mechanisms
- demographics
- depression
- discrimination
- employment
- ethics
- evolutionary-psych
- forensic
- gender
- humor grad-school
- interpersonal
- IO
- IVs-Dvs
- Jung
- library research
- men
- Muslim-Americans
- no-space
- OB
- online behavior
- pesudoscience
- politics
- psychinfo
- racism
- research-methods
- scholarship
- Scholarships and Jobs
- science
- science-politics
- sexual-assault
- social
- social rape-myth
- social-cognition
- Social-Influcence
- stigma
- summer reading
- systems-theory
- testing
- the basics
- tsunami
- women
- York
No comments:
Post a Comment