Data show extent of sexism in physics

from Nature
http://www.nature.com/news/2008/080423/full/452918a.html


Women are poorly represented in physics, making
up just 10% of faculty in the United States,
for example, but the reasons for this have proved
contentious. Now a particle physicist claims to
have hard data showing institutional sexism
at an experiment at one of America’s highestprofile
physics labs.
Sherry Towers claims that female postdocs
worked significantly harder than their male
peers but were awarded one-third as many conference
presentations proportionally. “There
was this shocking difference,” says Towers, who
now studies statistics at Purdue University in
West Lafayette, Indiana. “Particle physics really
hasn’t moved forward in 30 years.”
Towers used data from publicly available work
records to chart the careers of 57 postdoctoral
researchers, including nine women, who worked
on the ‘DZero’ particle detector at Fermilab in
Batavia, Illinois, between 1998 and 2006. Towers
herself worked as a postdoc on the project
between 2000 and 2005. The findings of her
survey were striking, she says. She claims that
women did 40% more maintenance work
than their male counterparts, and that female
postdocs produced significantly more ‘internal
papers’ per year. But based on that productivity
they were only one-third as likely to be allocated
conference talks as their male peers, she claims
(http://arxiv.org/abs/0804.2026).
Conference presentations are critical to a
young particle physicist’s career. Papers from
collaborations such as DZero have hundreds
of authors in alphabetical order. Being given
the chance to present results at a meeting is a
major way for young researchers to stand out.
“It’s important,” says Pauline Gagnon, a physicist
with the ATLAS detector at CERN near Geneva,
Switzerland. “Being able to give
talks is a way of rewarding individuals
for their work.”
Most particle detectors have
internal committees that allocate
conference presentations
to researchers. These committees
are frequently male-dominated,
and Towers believes this
lies behind the discrimination.
“I don’t think for a second that
there is a conscious bias going
on,” she says. But the committees
“are in danger of being
prone to patronage and cronyism”.
Male committee members are more likely
to nominate male protégés to receive presentation
time, she claims.
Some are sceptical of the findings. “I wasn’t
convinced that the effect she has found is real,”
says Kevin Pitts, a particle physicist at the University
of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Internal
papers are not necessarily a direct measure
of productivity, he argues, and the small number
of physicists surveyed is not enough to prove
systematic bias. But Pitts is quick to add that he
has little doubt that females do suffer gender discrimination:
“In fact,” he says, “I have personally
observed this on more than one occasion.”
Female physicists contacted by Nature said
Towers’s data matched their personal experiences
of institutional sexism in physics. “You often see a
young guy with an older guy gossiping and having
coffee, but never a woman,” says Freya Blekman, a
physicist on the CMS experiment at CERN. “I’m
convinced,” agrees Gagnon. “There is absolutely
no shadow of a doubt in my mind.” She says the
ATLAS collaboration is thinking about how to
address the problem in its own
speakers’ committee.
After Towers complained,
Fermilab launched an internal
review in autumn 2006,
says Bruce Chrisman, the
lab’s chief operating officer.
An edited copy of the review
obtained by Nature found that
the collaboration “followed
its policies correctly”. But the
investigator, a senior female
physicist, added that complaints
of gender discrimination
in the group “should not
be summarily dismissed”. There was a general
feeling that females were being “passed over”
for leadership roles, the report says.
DZero’s leaders counter that bias, if it ever
existed, is not plaguing the current collaboration.
A survey of data between August 2006 and
2007 showed that women gave 17% of all talks
despite making up just 12% of the collaboration,
says DZero spokesman Dmitri Denisov.
Powers says the investigation didn’t focus
on postdocs and hasn’t led to real changes at
DZero. She wants the conference allocation system
to be made more transparent and balanced.
“The changes that need to be made are simple,”
she says. “It wouldn’t cost them a dime.”
And Towers says gender discrimination ultimately
forced her out of particle physics. She
adds that in 2004 her former employer, a prominent
northeastern public university, tried to terminate
her contract after she complained that
she wasn’t given adequate maternity leave. She
has since filed a lawsuit against the university. ■
Geoff Brumfiel

Stress and Illness

As I always tell my students, stress is really, really bad. It exacerbates a lot of psychological and physical problems. Unfortunately, most students assume I mean that it causes these problems.

Stress Test
By PEGGY ORENSTEIN
Published: June 29, 2008
Why Americans want to believe that our mental states can control our physical maladies.
NY Times

UN Security Council to Discuss Sexual Violence

Today, Condoleezza Rice leads the United Nations Security Council in a discussion of sexual violence as a tactic of war. While the United Nations has previously recognized that sexual violence against women occurs in war, it has not created concrete steps for alleviating this atrocity or mechanisms for oversight and information gathering.

House Drops Affordable Birth Control Pricing Amendment

The US House passed a version of a supplemental war spending bill on Thursday which, unlike the Senate version passed last month, does not include an amendment to restore affordable access to birth control for college students and low-income women.

World's oldest companies!

World's oldest companies!

Mail I get from my union

CUNY faculty are in a teacher's union (PSC-CUNY), which is part of a larger teacher's union AFT. I received this email from AFT today.

http://www.freechoiceact.org/page/content/aft-aboutus/

I wasn't satisfied with this description so I went to the AFL-CIO's site and found this

http://www.aflcio.org/joinaunion/voiceatwork/efca/upload/EFCA_Summary.pdf

Email I get from the ACLU

Support Working Families!

Dear William,


What happens when you need time off to care for an ailing parent?

What do you do if you're pregnant, but you don't get paid maternity leave?


These are dilemmas that New Yorkers confront each day. Juggling work responsibilities and family commitments is part of modern life. But health issues should not force New Yorkers to choose between their paycheck and caring for their families.

That's why we need a comprehensive paid family leave law. Email your Senator today!

Paid family leave would provide a weekly benefit to help an employee care for a new child or a seriously ill family member. This benefit would cost employers nothing, and would cost workers only pennies a week.

Paid family leave will help all working families in New York. But women, who often work full time and shoulder the responsibility of caring for children and ailing relatives, are disproportionately impacted by policies that do not provide paid leave. Paid family leave will help New York women better juggle work, family and financial responsibilities, and will further the goal of true equality in the workplace.

Paid family leave will help employees care for their families without risking the paycheck they rely on, and without creating new burdens on employers.

Time is running out in the legislative session. Please e-mail your Senator today.

Send a letter to the following decision maker(s):
Your State Senator (if you live in New York)

Below is the sample letter:

Subject: Senator, please support paid family leave

Dear [decision maker name automatically inserted here],

I am writing to urge you to support comprehensive paid family leave legislation that will prevent families from having to choose between family responsibilities and financial solvency. The Assembly Speaker has introduced legislation, A.9245, that provides the best coverage. Now the Senate should do the same, and make paid family leave a reality in New York State.

Paid family leave would cost worker just pennies a week, and will create no new administrative requirements or financial burdens on employers.

Paid family leave would make New York a national leader in supporting working families. It would also further the important goals of equality by easing financial burdens that constrain women's choices.

Please support a bill modeled after Speaker Silver's comprehensive paid family leave bill, so New Yorkers will no longer have to choose between their paycheck and caring for their families.


Sincerely,

William Ashton

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
What's At Stake:

Too many New Yorkers are forced to decide between their paycheck and caring for their families.

For families today, it is common for both parents to work outside the home, or for the household to be headed by a single parent. Older family members are also living longer, and need more care in the later part of their lives.

Yet there is still no requirement that employers offer paid leave to enable working families to care for new babies or sick family members. The federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) guarantees unpaid leave for family health care issues. But most people cannot afford to forego pay, even in medical emergencies. Studies of workers who did not take allowed time off show that 77 percent said it was because they could not afford to miss a paycheck.

All New Yorkers will benefit from this legislation. But it is especially critical for women, who are often the primary caregivers for their families. Paid family leave furthers the goals of gender equality by reducing the financial burdens associated with caring for a new baby or sick family member. In supporting women’s choices, it also furthers the cause of reproductive freedom.

How paid family leave would work:

It simply amends the existing Worker’s Compensation Program, by extending benefits already available for temporary disability.
It is covered by insurance and paid for by employees themselves through small payroll deductions – so it does not increase payroll costs.
Benefits of $170 per week for up to 12 weeks will cost workers just pennies a week, or just more than $23 a year for each worker.

Campaign Expiration Date:
June 23, 2008